> Hi,
>
> I'll answer the poll gladly, but I must say that I'd like the 185-2 MUCH
> better if the atenuator was replaced by 2 or 3 aditional inputs. It would
> make it more versatile. My opinion.
>
> Thanks
> Sylvain

It would be easy to replace the attenuator by two inputs without attenuator.
But without an attenuated input it would not be possible to add a modulation
source with adjustable depth. From my experience this is very useful. If all
inputs are without attenuators one would need another module (attenuator)
for that job. But if the majority of the users will vote for a module
without an attenuator it's definitely no problem. It's actually a more
simple design.

Best wishes
Dieter Doepfer