i think that's a great idea.
best regards,
Bakis.



--- levka0 < levka@... > wrote:

> IMHO, this would be most interesting if this Q-VCA
> could also be
> connected to the A-149-9 behind the front pannels
> with a flat-cable
> (like A-149-1/2 and A-160/1), omitting the need for
> 4 extra patch
> cables.
>
> It would offer the combined benefits of efficient
> prepatching
> functionality as well as modular versatility.
> Without connecting
> this "under water" flat cable, this VCA could then
> be used for many
> other modules beside the A-143-9.
>
> Is this perhaps a feasible idea
>
> Best regards,
> Joost
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > We discussed the additional VCA option for the
> A-143-9 and have
> another suggestion:
> >
> > How about a separate quad VCA module with one
> common control
> (manual + ext. CV) for all VCAs. This module could
> be used even for
> other applications than only for the sine/cosine
> outputs of the A-
> 143-9. E.g. for the other four-fold modulation
> modules of the A-143-
> x series like the quad AD, quad ADSR or quad LFO. A
> separate quad
> VCA module would not be very much more expensive
> than four VCAs
> integrated into the A-143-9 (4 additional sockets
> plus a separate
> front panel). After all the quad VCA section of the
> A-143-9 would be
> also a separate pc board containing the four VCAs.
> If we add four
> input sockets and make a separate front panel we
> would have a
> separate quad VCA module which is from my point of
> view more
> flexible than four VCAs only for the A-143-9.
> >
> > Tell me what you think.
> >
> > Best wishes
> > Dieter Doepfer
> >
>
>
>

Bakis Sirros - Parallel Worlds
1 group owner
http://www.parallel-worlds-music.com
http://www.myspace.com/parallelworldsmusic
http://www.shimarecords.co.uk
http://www.rubber.gr
Athens-Greece

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!
Tired of spam Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com