So this time instead of the clear VCO-VCF-VCA type of logic I arranged
the modules solely with the idea that the patching should be spread
out evenly. This way I'll avoid a pileup of cables when 2 A-138 mixers
are side-by-side, for example.

No two alike modules are next to each other.

We'll see how it works out.. but this way all knob functions should be
easily accessed without having to part a sea of cables.

--- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , "buchla300" <david.morley@...> wrote:
>
> --- In Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com , William Soraparu
> <donnbill369@> wrote:
> >
> > Its up to the artist....agreed.....the layout of the modules is
> indicative sometimes of the artist's approach at the way he does his
> sound..
> >
> > Hawaii
> >
>
>
> Yes.
> It also depends on the machine!
> On my Polyfusion for example, the modules are kind of laid out in
> synth sections.
> so I have 3 complete synths within the synth and can keep them kind of
> seperate..
> Having said that, I tend to just find it more logical to follow the
> typical Moog layout. Sources then sound modifiers then Envelopes and
> Amplifiers
> It really depends though and change is a good thing ;)
>