Hi Florian,

For appegiators I have an SH101 and also a Roland 184 keyboard and my
Waldorf Pulse plus I have the MAM appegiator for controlling things like
my Technics WSA-1.

However in context of my modular system I suppose I misunderstood as I
thought the thread was talking about a midi only appegiator rather than
a midi to CV converter that has an appegiator sitting between the
outputs. This would be a great addition.

Thanks for the clarification.

David

David Salter
Senior Project Manager
Reuters Ltd
Tel +44 20 7542 2402
Mob +44 7990562402
email david.salter@...
RM david.salter.reuters@...



________________________________

From: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com [mailto: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com ]
On Behalf Of Florian Anwander
Sent: 18 May 2006 14:26
To: Doepfer_a100@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [spam] Re: 1 Re: ideas/opinions on quantizer and
(VC) arpeggiator


Hi David

> Where ever possible I would prefer to always have the option of

CV/gate. I don't use midi much as I find the 128 step quantising very
limited.
With an arpeggiator we are talking about how to generate note
information of a chord! This chord is broken up to an arpeggio. With CV
you can display a chord only by several parallel CVs (one for each note
of the chord).

I do not know how much about your experience with arpeggiators, but I
work really a lot with them in my SH-101 and the MonoPoly, and I mostly
use wide chords of more than six often over ten notes.

To be realistic: the question is only whether to use MIDI or to build a
separate keyboard with real keys.

Florian



________________________________

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "Doepfer_a100
< http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Doepfer_a100 > " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto: Doepfer_a100-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service < http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > .


________________________________




To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]